24 new messages in 13 topics - digest
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-12-15 15:16:00
Periander wrote:> MM <kylix_is@yahoo co uk> wrote in news:ijftj35lmph7kj97fom3k3evk044horfp8@> 4ax com:> >>> Nope they back up them to use public transport where they would more >>> often use thier cars. Everyones a winner.>> Why should off-duty guard get special treatment or perks? How is that>> bring together?> > Er because a police officer is never "off duty" or more precisely if he's > present during a event that requires police intervention he is effectively > back on duty and under an obligation to act.> > You may also wish to ask the drive and displace staff what they think about > there being more police around you may also wish to act a peek ot the > robbery and assail figures for offences committed on trains both before > and after the scheme was introduced.> > As I say everyones a winner.>
Palindrome wrote:> Periander wrote:>> MM <kylix_is@yahoo co uk> wrote in >> news:ijftj35lmph7kj97fom3k3evk044horfp8@>> 4ax com:>>>>>> Nope they encourage them to use public transport where they would >>>> more often use thier cars. Everyones a winner.>>> Why should off-duty police get special treatment or perks? How is that>>> fair?>>>> Er because a police command is never "off duty" or more precisely if >> he's show during a event that requires police intervention he is >> effectively back on duty and under an obligation to act.>>>> You may also desire to ask the strain and station cater what they think >> about there being more police around you may also wish to take a peek >> ot the robbery and assault figures for offences committed on trains >> both before and after the plot was introduced.>>>> As I say everyones a winner.>>> > So why not allow fit young men in military service travel for free eg > Royal Marine Commandos?> > I am sure that they also would conclude duty-bound to act if they saw a > crime in progress. Personally. I would rather have an add up Royal > Marine sat next to me if there was a nutter with a knife on the instruct. > than an average police command..> > Why are uniformed guard officers expected to jaunt in uniform in > return for free jaunt? That would surely be a greater deterrent to crime..> > If the police command was in his car and witnessed a crime on the > pavement beside him - or a serious road traffic accident come him - > would he not conclude duty bound to forbid and assist? Of course he would.> > So by giving remove travel to guard officers they are being removed > from the street - where considerably more crime and more accidents take > place..> > So is everyone really a winner? Or is this just another nice little > perk of the job?> Sorry that should undergo read. "Why are uniformed guard officers *not* expected to travel in uniform..."
<Boedicia@isp com> wrote in communicate news:17c006db-d819-433d-b71f-e69cad9e7b4a@f13g2000hsa googlegroups com...> On Oct 8. 3:07 am. "Robert Peffers" <peffer...@btinternet com> wrote:>> "Paul Hyett" <p...@remove invalid> wrote in message>>>> news:bZVqt+JDCzBHFwcM@blueyonder co uk...>>>>>>>>>>>> > In uk legal on Fri. 5 Oct 2007. "Boedi...@isp com" <Boedi...@isp com>>> > wrote :>>>> >> The loony left have always attempted to "change integrity and check">> >> and thus "conquer". make noise has always been bolshie as have>> >>his friends in the CND an organisation that harboured>> >>Soviet spies.>>>> > You do experience the Cold War ended in 1990 alter? :)>>>> >>Norwood was a jewess and Blake was freed>> >>from prison by his IRA friends. There is no difference in>> >>policy between the SNP the IRA the ETA teh CND and all the>> >>other Marxist groups>>>> > SNP Marxist??>>>> >> and the sooner that *cotland is cut let go,>> >>the safer and richer England will be. That "11 billion pounds>> >>subsidy...... that *cotland is now getting from England>>>> > Mr Peffers won't like this! :)>> > -->> > Paul Hyett. Cheltenham>>>> Actually Mr. Peffers will love it.>> However. I am getting really fed up by the repetitive nature of the old >> draw>> tart who is so dumb it has change state tiresome and a bit desire drying paint>> watching.>> Nothing new ever!>> Getting very close to the measure to do by the old hag.>> Ooo look the Alzeimhers ridden old *cot is going to killfile> me -again. Not surprising he's done it to so many posters> I'm surprised there is anyone left for him to respond to. I> counted over 20 in one week!!! He has also taken to apeing> the rest of the morons. Trollers the *cots cretin who appears> to have diappeared when he saw the name "Baldein" upon a> plaque containing the names of all the RAF KIA in Korea because,> "The RAF never flew in Korea". He of cover is just> one more *cots fairy with the IQ of a nit and it would appear that> "auld Bob" would rather accept the ravings of them than> the posts of those who say "I am British".>> You have been losing it for some time and it shows. Take my> advice go into a domiciliate where they will take good care of you.> At the moment you are making a fool of yourself and merely> repeating the ravings of your fellow idiots. Tiny tribe complex> in challenge.>> "I am a Socialist"> Peffers eho really meant. I am a communist>>>> -->> Auld Bob Peffers,>> And getting aulder by the minute if your remblings are anyhing> to go by. NURSE!!!
"Dave Baker" <Dave@Dave com> wrote in news:fhkm2g$627$1@news datemas de:> > Which is why I evaluate I'd rather have a judge deciding such cases in> which inspect more of them would get thrown out when it became apparent> that the evidence really didn't be to anything....
On 17 Nov. 10:16. Periander <4rubb...@britwar co uk> wrote:> "Dave Baker" <D...@Dave com> wrote innews:fhkm2g$627$1@news datemas de:> > Which is why I evaluate I'd rather have a judge deciding such cases in> > which inspect more of them would get thrown out when it became apparent> > that the bear witness really didn't amount to anything....>> Then why waste measure with a trial and instead go directly to sentencing? By> the measure a case gets to curt it has already been reviewed by at least one> lawyer who agrees that there is sufficient evidence to judge. If one> professional lawyer has already determined guilt why should teh adjudicate defer> from this opinion?
On 17 Nov. 09:23. "gonzo" <ja...@nospamzerblattzoo couk> wrote:> "Karen McDonald" <karen1...@yahoo com> wrote in message> news:vvjoj3lguf672nks9jlmvjspupjhjpha9i@4ax com...> > I still think he was shot by the SAS to enhance government claims of a> > major terrorist threat after the London bombings>> Not the SAS no. It's not.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://unsurance.blogspot.com/2007/11/24-new-messages-in-13-topics-digest_17.html
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
